Hallsands & the first UK suction aggregate dredgers
In 1896, under
contract with the Lords of the Admiralty, Sir John Jackson Ltd. was required to
supply “...materials for concrete for use
on the Keyham Dockyard extension......”
as part of the continuing development of the Devonport Dockyard complex in Devon . The “materials for concrete” were sand
and shingle which Sir John intended to source from local waters and in doing so
was to raise matters which, from time to time, still resonate in the modern
aggregate dredging industry and possibly saw the first use of a suction dredger
for winning aggregates in British waters.
Sir John’s 5th
August 1896 letter to the Under Secretary of the Board of Trade states that he
had “…already made arrangements with
Exeter Corporation for dredging in the River Axe with a view to securing a
slurry of sand and shingle...with a view of expediting the Keyham Dock Yard
work, preventing as much as practicable any possibility of delay from lack of
materials”. The letter apparently accompanied an application to dredge
stated areas and included a clue as to how he intended to win the material when
he wrote “….For the purpose of loading
such shingle as we do not dredge it may be necessary to erect a small jetty…”
It would appear that the application to dredge was granted as, on 7th December 1896, the Lincoln’s Inn Fields legal firm representing “…the Honourable Mark Rolls and his Trustees who are owners of the greater part of the Town of Exmouth and entitled to the foreshore as Lords of the Manor…” wrote to The Secretary of the Board of Trade stating “…we are instructed to call the attention of the Board of Trade to the dredging operations in front of the Town which, in communication with the Corporation of Exeter, have been commenced by Sir John Jackson, and are contemplated on a very considerable scale. There is reason to fear that such dredging may result in the formation of a new channel which might seriously damage Exmouth…”
It would appear that the application to dredge was granted as, on 7th December 1896, the Lincoln’s Inn Fields legal firm representing “…the Honourable Mark Rolls and his Trustees who are owners of the greater part of the Town of Exmouth and entitled to the foreshore as Lords of the Manor…” wrote to The Secretary of the Board of Trade stating “…we are instructed to call the attention of the Board of Trade to the dredging operations in front of the Town which, in communication with the Corporation of Exeter, have been commenced by Sir John Jackson, and are contemplated on a very considerable scale. There is reason to fear that such dredging may result in the formation of a new channel which might seriously damage Exmouth…”
The outcome of
this letter of concern was to end the River Exe dredging so, in April of the
following year Sir John Jackson, having signed an agreement with the Woods and
Forests Department and the Board of
Trade to pay £50 per annum in order “…to dredge and carry away all sand, shingle
and other like material from that portion of the bed of the sea below the low
water mark at Start Bay, and opposite Hall Sands and Beeson Sand......”
commenced dredging operations in the area “…first
using a bucket-ladder dredger which was later replaced by two suction-pump
dredgers…”
The two suction
dredgers mentioned were thought to be the Myrtle and Turtle which had been
towed from Dover after Sir John Jackson’s contract to construct a new harbour to
the east of Admiralty Pier was completed.
Photo of the dredgers working in Start Bay off Hallsands. If they are the Myrtle and Turtle they may well be the first marine aggregate suction dredgers to be used on the Coast of the UK.
Photo of the dredgers working in Start Bay off Hallsands. If they are the Myrtle and Turtle they may well be the first marine aggregate suction dredgers to be used on the Coast of the UK.
In 1901 concern
expressed by the inhabitants of Hallsands and their Member of Parliament Col.
Frank B.Mildmay regarding the adverse effect the dredging was having on the
Hallsands beach, saw one Captain Frederick commissioned by the Board of Trade
to visit Hallsands and report upon the situation. Said report gives a little
more detail of how the dredging operation was carried out when it mentions
that “… the nature (of the seabed) is
such that it is easily transported by the action the sea, and has a general
tendency to be drawn down to fill the holes made by the dredger.”
Further on the
report appears to indicate that the dredger is moored in some way when it
mentions “….buoys have been laid down by
the contractor at regular intervals to enable the dredger to quickly pick up
her position, while anchors and bolts have been placed above the high water
mark to which breast fasts are secured.” And again “The presence of the dredger, tugs and barges with the accompanying buoys
and moorings are especially detrimental to seine fishing (in the
area)….”
Lastly, a grainy
photo “…of a dredger at work in Start Bay”
in ‘The Tragedy of Hallsands Village’ by John L. Harvey appears shows the bows
of two ship shaped vessels, one of which at least has a traditional looking
ship’s funnel, with a stout (mooring?) rope secured in bights along her hull.
There were
therefore one, perhaps two, suction dredgers working on the contract which
discharged into a shuttle service of steam driven hopper barges with a capacity
of 1100 tons each which carried the aggregate to Devonport. This is confirmed
in chapter 4, entitled ‘The Coming of the Dredger’of Ruth & Frank Milton’s
book ‘Sisters Against The Sea’.
The Coast Guard reported 97,000 tons of shingle was removed in 1900 and 104,000 tons the following year. Captain Frederick’s report contributed to the Board of Trade’s decision to revoke Sir John Jackson’s licence in January 1902 but not before a total of 650,000 tons had been removed and “..the mischief (to Hallsands village) had already been done”.
Clearly not a man
to give up easily for, having been engaged in dredging on the Skerries bank
offshore north east of Start Point entitled ‘The Coming of the Dredger’ for
some time, on 1st March 1904
Sir John wrote to The Assistant Secretary of the Board of Trade expressing
surprise that the revoking of his Hallsands licence included wider waters when
he wrote “ I think I ought to add that
until our recent correspondence it had never occurred to me that it was necessary
to obtain the Consent of the Crown or anyone else for the removal of material
from the Skerries”.
Sir John’s letter
includes “…the undertaking which I now
give: not to remove below High Water without the consent of the Crown any sand
or material of any other description from the Skerries or any other place in Start
Bay ”.
With dredging
areas off the Devon coast closed to him, Sir John was “.. forced to find an alternative source
(off the Isle of Wight )
for the material required to complete his dockyard contract.”
Sir John Jackson
made his name building the foundations for London ’s Tower Bridge and most of the Manchester Ship Canal . The contract to build the huge 114 acre
Keyham extension to Devonport dockyard took ten years to complete, cost £6 million
and employed some 3,400 men.
Sir John Jackson
became one of the greatest civil engineering contractors of his age - an age
when Britain built most of the major Infrastructure
projects in the world. His most important work was at a time when Victorian and
Edwardian engineers were at their most ambitious - and saw that machinery was
the key to success. Jackson always had the latest equipment and as a result was one of
those who led the way out of the navvy era into the modern age of bigger and
better machines.
Maintenance Vs Aggregate dredging
Trailing suction maintenance
dredgers pre-dated aggregate dredgers by some margin and the material they
dredged would sometimes be of a quality which, in the fullness of time, would
also be dredged and sold by aggregate dredgers rather than being dredged and disposed
of as spoil by maintenance / capital dredgers. A case in point was when, during
the 1907 Engineering Conference, it was stated that that the material removed to date from
the bar of the Mersey, from the Crosby Channel and other points of the main
channel by the 2383grt 1895 built ss G.B.Crow and the 2483grt 1893
built ss Brancker was
108,675,570tons.
I am from South Devon and remember as A child the last house still standing in Hallsands. By that time, the early nineteen sixties, the cottage looked as if it had been built on rocks right on the shoreline, although its position was due to the erosion of the rest of the village. The house was inhabited by an eccentric old lady with numerous cats. My father told me that local people had warned the Admiralty of the disastrous effects dredging would have because there was an offshore current which was diverted from Hallsands and Beesands by the sandbank. Once it was gone the villages had no defence. Beesands still exists but only because sea defaences have been created at considerable coste. David Mahoney
ReplyDeleteVery many thanks for the information...I would very much like to know if the dredging was indeed carried out by a suction dredger/s as I currently believe
ReplyDelete